Archive for the ‘Design in My Days’ Category

Why can’t we be Friends: Why it doesn’t matter so much what kind of blocks you buy your kid

Sunday, September 2nd, 2012

So it seems the LEGO Friends sets are a success, in spite of a spate of dissent.

I’d gotten over the hoopla that bubbled up over the Friends blocks when they first came out last spring—feminists who actually thought griping to LEGO was important, worthwhile work, and then this article that devolves into highlighting the Friends fight as an example of modern feminism. (As well as many others…) They get all up in arms because there’s a café and a beauty shop, and generally don’t mention the inventor’s workshop, tree house or vet. Not that I personally think a child’s future career is going to be based on what they play with at five. The kids of today will probably have jobs that don’t exist yet!

Anyway, just today I came across another reference to the “issues” with the line of blocks in a Jacobin magazine article discussing design’s role in establishing and maintaining class distinction (and more).

This is why women’s rights groups were so pissed off when LEGO released its dumbed-down “LadyFigs” line targeted at young girls. By simplifying a common toy for girls to use, LEGO was not only insulting girls by implying that they are technically inept, uninterested in challenges and generally stupider than boys; more importantly, the company was also proliferating objects that obviously embodied some blatantly discriminatory ideas about differences between the sexes. The point would not be lost on a five-year-old, who would realize immediately that compared to her brother’s LEGOs, hers look like they were made for an idiot.

Really? Do any of these people have kids that actually play with blocks?

I just thought they were super-cute and got a few sets for my daughter to complement the basic bricks and City advent calendar pieces we had. We had fun building the Friends sets according to the instructions—at the time she was 4, now 5, and so right at the early end of the suggested age. We weren’t “insulted” by the simplicity or anything like that—again, she’s young. Would she find it challenging at an older age to follow the directions and built the set as shown? Probably not. But, who am I to judge some other  child who at 8 or 10 still would? Not everything has to be brain-busting work, does it? The many feminist voices that had charged that the Friends sets were dumbed down, much easier to put together, than say a Millenium Falcon, or whatnot, didn’t really resonate with me. Personally, I’d like to someday get the Farnsworth House or Willis Sears Tower sets, but these Friends sets were great now for my preschooler. And really, it’s up to parents to be observant of their child’s interests and abilities and choose toys that can help enhance learning, or, just be fun.

What many commenters on the LEGO Friends sets seem to miss is that once a kid builds any LEGO set (the Friends café or the Millenium Falcon—Jaws was never my scene and I don’t like Star Wars) it’s kind of over and the best play comes when they just build their own creations from basic bricks—or the ruins of the café! I mean, anyone who can read (or be read to) can follow directions on how to build someone else’s designs, right? The real fun and creativity and design and engineering learning comes from making one’s own ideas real. So does it matter, really, whether the blocks are pink or blue? My kid likes to have a full array of colors for the various cars, dinosaurs, crocodiles, and Dr. Seuss-like fantasy edifices she creates.

And besides, lately her medium of choice has been plain old construction paper, glue and tape. Lots and lots of tape.

 

Atlantic magazine: The 80s called and wants its cover back

Sunday, June 24th, 2012

I read the recent Atlantic cover story, “Why Women Still Can’t Have it All” with great interest. I really appreciated former head of policy planning at the State Department, Anne-Marie Slaughter for being another voice coming out in support of work-life balance in general—and for moms/parents in particular. I think it’s part of the slow, but certain, wheel of change that will bring us to a better place.

Ensuring there are mothers in high-level government and business positions will help diversify the leadership and balance policymaking.

To me, it’s not really so much about whether or not I personally “have it all.” I feel like I do, for what I want—an interesting design and writing career on my terms and time to spend with my family. I’m not famous or making big waves in the world, but I am happy.

There are many women who are more ambitious than me and they deserve a better shot/more societal support at staying in high-ranking careers with influence over public policy (and business) because I think they bring balance and perspective that childless (or even certain dads that are traditionally less engaged) can’t bring, and we can’t have the world run by people who don’t understand the needs of children and families.

Bitch magazine gave what I think is a pretty good analysis of the article itself, identifying feminist critique of Slaughter’s piece as a “mixed bag.”

The presentation of the article via its weird cover art and its headline, though, were again very disappointing (see TIME magazine analysis) and did nothing to sell the true concept of Slaughter’s piece.

That outfit the woman is wearing is very dated, as is the briefcase, and the whole trite visual play of the baby in the briefcase. Really?  It reminds me of Diane Keaton in Baby Boom circa 1987! Has nothing changed since 1987. I guess not enough. But, we’re getting there.

 

Perfection ends at home

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

* colors are weird! see footnote!

I’m a bit of a perfectionist professionally. I’ve never missed a deadline. Once my computer died right in the middle of a client’s newsletter cycle. I went out and bought a new one, installed all the needed software and got the job done on time—with my near two-year-old in tow the whole time. See this press release? It’s dated my child’s birthday. The actual day my kid was born. I think I posted that early in labor, sometime mid-day. Not only am I on time for clients (and employers) but I’m on point. Everyone makes mistakes once in a while, of course, but a perfectionist genuinely feels bad about a mistake, fixes it promptly, apologizes and does better next time.

In my personal life, it’s a whole other story!

The past couple of weekends I’ve been doing some home improvement projects and my lack of perfectionism in my own life for my own things really was thrown in my own face—by me. I paint as well as I can. I hate the process of taping off ceilings and trim, though, and while I told myself this time I’d do it, I did about 4 feet of taping, got impatient and decided—screw it, I have a good and steady hand and I can do it without tape. For the most part I did and it looks fine. That’s me. Fine. The hallway by our bedrooms still isn’t done and I don’t think I’m going to make my self-imposed deadline of this Friday because I’m just over it, and I am totally OK with that. It will get done when it gets done.

Another weekend project was installing a backsplash in my kitchen. Overall, for a non-handy person, I think it looks pretty good and I am proud of it. Is it perfect? No! And I’m not going to waste my time detailing all the ways it’s not perfect. No normal person who comes to the house would probably notice (OK, they might, no slam against them, but would they care? I sure don’t think so!)

As long as we’re talking about imperfection and missed goals, let’s talk about my body! I’ve been scribbling out and rewriting weight loss goals on my calendar all year. I have been losing weight, and I am generally fine with my body, but ideally, I need to lose 10-15 pounds. I’ve had mini victories, in fits and starts, and I have no doubt that eventually I will succeed in reaching my goal, but, if I was doing this weight loss and getting in shape work for a client, I’d have been fired by now!

And…this is so unlike me…remember that Sketchbook Project thing I signed up for? Due postmarked next week? I’m scrambling to get it done. I never scramble at the last minute on projects for others. But, that’s just how it goes sometimes when you are self-employed, your own projects come only after your client projects—and all the work of holding the house together—are done. (I won’t even go into detail on how far behind I am on my Code Academy lessons!)

Taking a break from all the home improvement projects, I went to hot yoga yesterday. Here, my imperfection smacked me upside the head like a 2×4! Sweating my ass off, struggling to hold poses I’m not nearly as deep into as I should be, feeling so tired, almost broken. But instead of breaking, I melt. I ooze into my imperfection and my thoughts go to my dear husband and child at home, playing together, somehow getting along with out me so I may have this time. And I think of how much they love me, as imperfect as I am, and it’s so wonderful!

Clients and bosses don’t love you. They may like you a lot, you may do a great job for them, like I do. I get so much satisfaction from a job well done and having people paying me for my work being very pleased with what I’ve done for them. But, oh, how much more satisfaction do I get from people who love me NOT for my perfection, but without even a thought of my imperfection! They love me because I am me and because I am theirs! They just appreciate that I do things like paint and try to keep up our house and make them food and cuddle them. I don’t have to be a professional at any of it for them—though I am a damn good cook!

 

 

* A word about color: The color in these photos looks a little off and I don’t have time to futz with the settings, but in person, I’m happy with it! A friend asked which shot best represented the color and it kind of depends where you stand and which lights are on. Neither pic looks quite right to me, but the rosier I think are closer. I would say the colors are fairly neutral bluish greys, but the darkest grey, when you’re in the room picks up the purple-ish counters (which I don’t want to keep forever anyway, but felt like I had to work with for the time being…) just wanted something very basic and neutral without being just plain white or cream.

Interesting or good? Interesting or happy?

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

Mies van der Rohe, a design hero of mine, once said “I don’t want to be interesting. I want to be good.” He meant his architectural designs, of course, but what are we doing other than designing our own lives? The comparison can be pondered generally about life, as well. Interesting or good? By “good” Mies likely meant serving a purpose, in the form follows function vein. And without superfluous decoration. As explained in the Wikipedia entry, he strove for a minimal framework of structural order balanced against the implied freedom of free-flowing open space. I could go on and on relating minimalism to contentment, but then I wouldn’t be being minimalist, so I hope, dear reader, that you “get it,” at least a little.

Interesting or happy?

Recently, I stumbled upon Penelope Trunk, a former startup exec, now homeschooler, conflicted work-at-home mom, blogger and generally supersmart and interesting ultra drama queen, who is going to say in her forthcoming book (I think) that it’s better to have an interesting life.

She has many posts on her blog about a happy life vs an interesting life, including a quiz she says helps determine whether your life is happy or interesting. My result was -1, which means: You are suspiciously well balanced. Or lacking a self-identity. I’m not sure which. I am going to go with well balanced. I don’t seek happiness, I seek contentment, which is even better, but maybe even more boring.

For me, it is more important to live a happy/content life. I think it is  important to be able to find it without relying on material things or even other people. As I type this, I don’t know that valuing this is, necessarily, that much different from having an interesting life, it must depend on who’s assessing it, and I can only assume that each person must be responsible for assessing whether their own life is interesting or not. I mean one person’s interesting, is another person’s harried. I hate harried.

Trunk says in another post, “I think I want an interesting life. Not that I want to be interesting, but I want to be interested. I’m talking about what I think is interesting to me. I want to choose things that are interesting to me over things that would make me happy.” I do, too, but I don’t believe that I have to live in New York, change jobs alot (or even have a job), or insist on alot of choices to be interested. In fact, I am overwhelmed by being interested.

Part of my “problem” is that I am interested in too many things. I wake up, thinking I’m going to check e-mail, see what’s up on Facebook since I last checked before going to bed (and sometimes if I wake up in the middle of the night) and then move on to my day. But, I often stumble upon a link someone posted, or remember something I wanted to find out, then one thing leads to another, and another and I am dreaming up some new side project or buying a book I must read, or finding out about something I must try. This happens too much. This (and having to actually work to come up with money for living and tuition) is why it took me 10 years to complete an undergrad degree. To some extent, this keeps me from achieving the Miesian goal of being “good” (jack of all trades, master of nothing). To get good, you need some focus, right? I’m good at focusing on specific projects, like in a work environment. I am good at meeting deadlines for others, but when it comes to the openness of my own mind, my own life, it’s another story.

One such recent Facebook post (thanks again, LotusBluMama) lead me to this idea of keeping a logbook (instead of a full-on journal, where, you know, you have to write longhand sentences and full thoughts). The logbook is brilliant. Quick bites of things that hit you that may be useful or interesting to remember. I started one for the new year and already what stands out to me is how I want to be more present with my child. So, I have to find more interest in things I can do with her than in my internet explorations, or  at least strive for more balance than I have now. This is likely to be my last winter at home with her and then, last spring, and maybe even last summer, before school and bigger-kid life sets in. I need to be more focused on savoring this time. I need to be present.

A Mayo Clinic article talks about cultivating contentment and lists among its tips devoting time to family and friends, and living in the moment. I know I have heard in yoga practice that being present is key to contentment. I would like to find more scholarly articles, maybe studies on this to link to, but I think in my heart I know it (INFJ, here). And as I try to complete my thoughts and wrap this post in a good way, my girl is literally clamoring for my attention and so I must go.

This post is shared, but by no means complete. But if I don’t come back to it for a while, it’s a good thing, because it will mean I have found the strength to focus on things to make me more good. And, in one is good the way Mies meant it, they are bound to also be interesting.

On Yoga, and Progress

Sunday, January 1st, 2012

Today I went to a special two-hour hot yoga class. Not Bikram, but a vinyasa flow class in a hot room. It was awesome. Loved it. It was challenging. Humbling. Exhilarating. I was going to write this post about how I am content doing yoga DVDs at home casually—my “brown bag yoga”—how gratifying that is, etc. but being in this class kind of took it to another level.

I guess it was just a really good class (Jennifer at Mind the Mat). I’ve tried classes now and then, some were alright, others just bleh. Now, I want to find ways to go again—same studio, same instructor. It was just that good. She had the perfect pacing of challenge and rest. She incorporated partner assists that were actually really effective and not awkward. I did an assisted handstand! I never do handstands! I sweat my ass off. It was wonderful

I will still do my at-home practice, of course, because really I can go to a studio, at most, once a week. I really saw today, though, how complacent I’ve gotten just doing my DVDs. It is hard to focus in your own home. Your kid needs something. There’s dust under the TV cabinet. My laptop is right there. Do I have e-mail? I am re-committing to make more of an effort in my home practice, but I think this is the year that I will add real, live classes.

I’ve actually been doing yoga semi-consistently for a couple years now, and posted about it before in past blogs, below, but I can’t say I’ve progressed in my practice. So, in addition to “brown bagging it” I am going to enjoy feasting on classes with some regularity this year.

From July 2010

I came across an article in the NYT that showed a side of yoga I don’t really know. I mean, it’s not that hard for me to see that this side would be out there, that it would exist, but I guess it’s just not on my radar. It makes sense that anything people enjoy could also become a source for business and enterprise, but it’s just not what yoga means to me.

The article opens saying “There is so much going on in John Friend’s life right now that an assistant once teased him about waking just before dawn and calling to ask for coffee, only to be reminded that he, Friend, was in Quito, Munich or Seoul, while the assistant was back at home base in the Woodlands, a cushy suburb north of Houston.”

That’s funny. Too busy, too crazy, scattered. The exact opposite of what yoga is supposed to be. To me.

I do yoga in any old comfortable clothes, in my house, with a DVD, while my kids plays around me. It brings me peace. It gets my blood flowing. It cleanses me, centers me, balances me. I need this. Alot.

I don’t get the expensive classes, retreats and gear. Yoga is almost like brushing my teeth, but more special. Maybe it’s like a religion, too. People go on religious retreats, I guess. But, for me, it’s just a part of my day I really love that I need to use to keep me on track, mentally, physically and spiritually.

From March, 2010

I came across a post on Slate’s Double X blog the other day that was a great intersection of some of my most keen interests—work-life balance, feminism and yoga! The headline was “Yoga Mats Won’t Solve Your Stress Issues” and the HTML title to the web page was “Buying things won’t keep you from stressing out”; both intriguing titles that may misrepresent the point the poster was trying to make, but that play nicely into a point I would make.

First, about the post: It springboards from a recent New York Times Magazine piece, “Depression’s Upside,” arguing that the contemporary norm of alleviating the discomfort of depression through drugs short-cuts the important problem-solving process we need to go through to attack why we’re sad. The post asks “Could the same be said about stress?” And points to an article in Feminism & Psychology that makes a similar case—that efforts to stamp out women’s stress ignores the very real problems that are stressing us out, namely working for a living while running a household. What’s more, when mama ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy, so women’s stress also can have deleterious effects on the kids and husbands in our lives.

Double X’s post says “She’s got to remain calm at all costs. Thus, responsible women are on a perpetual quest for so-called ‘balance,’ which, of course, is impossible to achieve.” And, according to the Fem/Psych piece, society is telling women they can resolve work-family tensions by fixing themselves. “As long as women are increasingly helped to view stress—and their own emotional reactions to it—as the enemy to be vanquished, possibilities for widespread social critique and social action will be effaced.” Double X says, “Women see their stress as a personal problem and not a structural one, such as lack of family friendly workplace policies or affordable housing… it would be nice if the few things that busy women did for themselves [to relieve their stress] weren’t regarded as a new category of ‘work.’”

Now, I agree that women, working moms in particular, are stressed. Who could deny that? Recent pieces/blogs in the Washington Post and New York Times dealt with this, and I became fully absorbed in them, almost like watching a horror movie, reading about these tales of endless days, endless chores and no light at the end of the tunnel. A big feature in the Washington Post magazine really delved into the harried lives of working moms, with one woman’s personal account of where her time goes. Especially troubling was the Washington Post piece talking about how some people actually lose money by working, by the time they are done paying for childcare. Ouch! Thing is, I am one of the lucky ones, as I am not particularly stressed, anymore.

How did I become un-stressed? I have to credit yoga. It could be something else, too, but I do think yoga has so much to do with it and its the biggest, most clear change I’ve made. Ever since January of this year, I’ve been doing about a half hour of yoga 5-6 mornings a week (basically just skipping the day I go running for 2-3 hours, because I just feel too selfish doing all that). It makes alot of difference in my mood. You may remember, I had some rough times with stress previously then finally recognized that things were getting really bad late last year (although I approached that post mostly with good humor). I started out doing yoga as a tool for my weight loss efforts because I thought that doing something to focus my mind and my intentions for the day before mindlessly stuffing random food into my mouth for breakfast would help me make better food choices. Also, it would be a way to start the day with at least a little exercise that would be OK if it was interrupted by my small child (unlike cardio and such, where you need to keep your heart rate up, etc.) And, maybe, just maybe by kid would join with me in some of the poses or at least the spirit of it, and it would be a togetherness thing. It all worked out just like I hoped.

Of course, my child sometimes interrupts me when I’m doing yoga, but as a general rule, I don’t stop what I’m doing unless it’s an emergency or it’s during a transitional pose or something really quick. I do talk to her, if she talks to me, responding to her chatter and such, but it’s all very pleasant and I still feel that I reap the benefits of doing yoga. I still am moving my body in a deliberate, yet flowing, way, that stretches me physically, emotionally and mentally and makes me feel so good. I still am paying attention to my breath. I still know I am doing something with a centuries-old, sacred tradition and that if I am going to be mean or bitchy or petty that that is dishonoring this tradition. The tradition of yoga reminds me, with its opening and closing greeting or wish “namaste” that I am part of the universe and all of the universe is within me, and so I better be nice and not hate because what I am hating is in me, too. But I don’t think of all this consciously at the surface, it’s just kind of there, deep within. And no, I am not perfect. I still lose my temper with my kid sometimes and I still bitch at my husband, but I do it much less and I feel I am on a gentle ramp up to more peace and acceptance as each day goes along.

It took me a long time to like yoga. I tried it many times in various forms and it never really took completely til recently. I think its because this was when my life needed it most, and, because I found a really good, capsulized routine that worked for me. I had the DVD for a few years and tried it now and then, but only recently did it click. For me, it’s the perfect routine because it’s simple enough for me to lose myself in the breaths and the flow, but it’s athletic enough for me to actually feel things and the poses aren’t held too long to the point of boredom or discomfort. That, and the fact that it’s only about 40 minutes, and there are decent breaks in the flow at 20 minutes, 25 minutes and 30 and 35 minutes, if you have less time. The DVD is the Crunch Perfect Yoga Workout and I do the “Fat Burning” one. Seriously. I love it.

Doing something specific for yourself that takes you out of your usual mode and that you know if good for you can do wonders for your attitude and can give you alot of hope. For me, this is yoga. For someone who doesn’t run already, it could be running. (I already ran and so I needed something else, and something with a more spiritual side, although I can find alot of peace in running, too.) I would argue that every person, no matter how busy, can find a half hour a day if they want to.

As to the idea that yoga or other earnest forms of stress-relief are just a band-aid and don’t solve the real social problems that are at the core of why women are so stressed, I’d say that you still have to make it through the day. And frankly, when I dwell too much on the large problems of the world, that gets me down and I feel helpless. Let’s face it, some of these things are just too big, too complicated, and we have to make it through the day and try to do it with some joy and grace, right? We do need to take care of ourselves first, and at the same time we need to be tuned in to the fact that if we are, honestly, stressed out all the time, that it’s just not sustainable. I do believe in working toward bigger social goals that we may be interested in, like gentler workplace policies (for all people, not just families, everyone needs work-life balance) but in the mean time, we do need to take care of ourselves. And, perhaps dropping out a little from the rat race, whenever and wherever possible, instead of this madness of always striving for more and keeping up with the Joneses, is a way of passive resistance that can, over time, effect social change. Maybe doing yoga or participating in some other kind of mindful practice that has nothing to do with paying the bills or keeping up in society would provide the mental cleanse women needed to empower themselves further. Just think, if all these stressed out working moms just said NO, all at once, to being over-extended, what would happen?

Full disclosure: To many, I may not qualify as a woman who would be stressed out, so my reflections may be discounted. On the other hand, my situation may also be viewed as an example of what might be, if one so chose. I do not work full time outside the home at this point in my life. I have a pre-school age child and I work part-time from home. I do not outsource childcare, but she does attend a low-key neighborhood preschool 8 hours a week. I work on average 15 hours a week, sometimes up to 20. For this, I recognize, I am pretty lucky. At the same time, I worked to set the situation up, and, we live a little differently than some peers who have two full-time incomes. On the other hand, in this economy, we are also better off than many who are scrambling to get by on two full-time incomes. It’s not for me to solve all the complicated issues at play in the world, just for me to do the best I can within my own framework and approach others with compassion and understanding.

Me time

Saturday, November 19th, 2011

This will never be an ad for Nike. The glory of running slowly.
I ran a 5:30 mile in highschool, but as an adult I never was a superfast runner. I’ve run marathons. Personal best, 4:11. I am much slower now. I feel like nowadays I run more slowly than ever. I typically do a run of a little over 5 miles that includes a loop around a nearby lake. Sometimes running is really my only time alone. It’s my quiet time. It’s my own loud time, if I choose to rock out with my headphones. My time to commune with nature. My therapy. My thinking time. I come up with the best ideas running. It’s serious me time. So, do I run so slowly to make it last longer or because I am older, fatter and just slower? Maybe a little bit of both.

The shape of things

Saturday, November 12th, 2011

BY WAY OF INTRODUCTION:

I’ve done some blogging during the time I’ve been an independent design and communications consultant. This is the same time that I gave birth, was on maternity leave and then decided to take this time to hang with my baby at home while I did some design work. I’ve kept the blogging mostly private, as it focused on chronicling my baby’s milestones, and me sorting out my views on motherhood (something I was new at) and societal issues concerning motherhood and feminism. Very loaded stuff (the latter).

Coming out of that, some four years later, my final analysis is that each woman has to decide for herself and her family what works and what will make them happy/allow them to survive—or something within that range. There are no “one-size-fits-all” rules or ways to do things. To me, it’s unsatisfying and boring, too, to argue with people about what’s best when there is no “best.” And now, after a blogging hiatus, and with a child who’s no longer a baby and me beyond those years where thoughts were dominated by guidebooks, discussions and decisions, mixed with post-pregnancy hormones and lack of sleep, I am feeling a movement toward again blogging about things that matter to me: still motherhood, but more within a frame of design and art and contemporary culture, in a visual and non confrontational way that I hope will be transcendent.

The deepest feelings about motherhood for me don’t deal with whether breast is best or I stayed home with my baby or not, or whether a child should be spanked or have time outs or no punishment at all. Although I do have opinions on all those matters. They are peripheral to the core feelings. And the core feelings are what I think most women (or, more women, at least) can share. This crazy, awesome love for our children.

THE VISUALS:

I came across this image for a piece I read on Jezebel the other day that touched on the crazy, awesome love we have for babies, and included a graphic that solved the weird baby imagery problem.

By “weird baby imagery problem” I mean that, to me, it’s really hard to illustrate a baby without it looking either cartoony, too cutesy, or just plain scary. I’m not big on highly-technical representational art (can appreciate the skill, but it’s just not my thing) and these kind of images don’t distill down to enough of an essence, a lot of the time. They can often risk the viewer getting too hung up on the details of the image than the feeling of the image. In addition, photos may not always be anonymous enough for my taste/purposes, if left un-retouched. Again, too much thinking about the particular baby shown than the more abstract feelings the image is meant to evoke. All that said, I don’t know why it never dawned on me to consider the silhouette, just the shape, just a suggestion of the idea.

So, I tried some quickies of my own, using personal photos as a guide:

And it hit me that the silhouette, if given even more time to capture a feeling than I did in these quickly whipped up graphics, could be a really effective style of image to use in those layouts that call for human figure-based representation of ideas of mama and baby love.

And, using images with the contrast way up and details darkened, as in the one that opened the post, or the shadows of me and my child on a hike, below, is another way.

And, now I must sign off, because I am being called…